تسجيل الدخول

مشاهدة النسخة كاملة : How I Came to Love the Veil ....By Yvonne Ridley



karam hammad
01-18-2007, 02:11 AM
I found this article really interesting... enjoy :)


How I Came to Love the Veil
By Yvonne Ridley
Sunday, October 22, 2006; B01
LONDON
I used to look at veiled women as quiet, oppressed creatures -- until I was captured by the Taliban.
In September 2001, just 15 days after the terrorist attacks on the United States, I snuck into Afghanistan, clad in a head-to-toe blue burqa, intending to write a newspaper account of life under the repressive regime. Instead, I was discovered, arrested and detained for 10 days. I spat and swore at my captors; they called me a "bad" woman but let me go after I promised to read the Koran and study Islam. (Frankly, I'm not sure who was happier when I was freed -- they or I.)
Back home in London, I kept my word about studying Islam -- and was amazed by what I discovered. I'd been expecting Koran chapters on how to beat your wife and oppress your daughters; instead, I found passages promoting the liberation of women. Two-and-a-half years after my capture, I converted to Islam, provoking a mixture of astonishment, disappointment and encouragement among friends and relatives.
Now, it is with disgust and dismay that I watch here in Britain as former foreign secretary Jack Straw describes the Muslim nikab -- a face veil that reveals only the eyes -- as an unwelcome barrier to integration, with Prime Minister Tony Blair, writer Salman Rushdie and even Italian Prime Minister Romano Prodi leaping to his defense.
Having been on both sides of the veil, I can tell you that most Western male politicians and journalists who lament the oppression of women in the Islamic world have no idea what they are talking about. They go on about veils, child brides, female circumcision, honor killings and forced marriages, and they wrongly blame Islam for all this -- their arrogance surpassed only by their ignorance.
These cultural issues and customs have nothing to do with Islam. A careful reading of the Koran shows that just about everything that Western feminists fought for in the 1970s was available to Muslim women 1,400 years ago. Women in Islam are considered equal to men in spirituality, education and worth, and a woman's gift for childbirth and child-rearing is regarded as a positive attribute.
When Islam offers women so much, why are Western men so obsessed with Muslim women's attire? Even British government ministers Gordon Brown and John Reid have made disparaging remarks about the nikab -- and they hail from across the Scottish border, where men wear skirts.
When I converted to Islam and began wearing a headscarf, the repercussions were enormous. All I did was cover my head and hair -- but I instantly became a second-class citizen. I knew I'd hear from the odd Islamophobe, but I didn't expect so much open hostility from strangers. Cabs passed me by at night, their "for hire" lights glowing. One cabbie, after dropping off a white passenger right in front of me, glared at me when I rapped on his window, then drove off. Another said, "Don't leave a bomb in the back seat" and asked, "Where's bin Laden hiding?"
Yes, it is a religious obligation for Muslim women to dress modestly, but the majority of Muslim women I know like wearing the hijab, which leaves the face uncovered, though a few prefer the nikab. It is a personal statement: My dress tells you that I am a Muslim and that I expect to be treated respectfully, much as a Wall Street banker would say that a business suit defines him as an executive to be taken seriously. And, especially among converts to the faith like me, the attention of men who confront women with inappropriate, leering behavior is not tolerable.
I was a Western feminist for many years, but I've discovered that Muslim feminists are more radical than their secular counterparts. We hate those ghastly beauty pageants, and tried to stop laughing in 2003 when judges of the Miss Earth competition hailed the emergence of a bikini-clad Miss Afghanistan, Vida Samadzai, as a giant leap for women's liberation. They even gave Samadzai a special award for "representing the victory of women's rights."
Some young Muslim feminists consider the hijab and the nikab political symbols, too, a way of rejecting Western excesses such as binge drinking, casual sex and drug use. What is more liberating: being judged on the length of your skirt and the size of your surgically enhanced breasts, or being judged on your character and intelligence? In Islam, superiority is achieved through piety -- not beauty, wealth, power, position or sex.
I didn't know whether to scream or laugh when Italy's Prodi joined the debate last week by declaring that it is "common sense" not to wear the nikab because it makes social relations "more difficult." Nonsense. If this is the case, then why are cellphones, landlines, e-mail, text messaging and fax machines in daily use? And no one switches off the radio because they can't see the presenter's face.
Under Islam, I am respected. It tells me that I have a right to an education and that it is my duty to seek out knowledge, regardless of whether I am single or married. Nowhere in the framework of Islam are we told that women must wash, clean or cook for men. As for how Muslim men are allowed to beat their wives -- it's simply not true. Critics of Islam will quote random Koranic verses or hadith, but usually out of context. If a man does raise a finger against his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her body, which is the Koran's way of saying, "Don't beat your wife, stupid."
It is not just Muslim men who must reevaluate the place and treatment of women. According to a recent National Domestic Violence Hotline survey, 4 million American women experience a serious assault by a partner during an average 12-month period. More than three women are killed by their husbands and boyfriends every day -- that is nearly 5,500 since 9/11.
Violent men don't come from any particular religious or cultural category; one in three women around the world has been beaten, coerced into sex or otherwise abused in her lifetime, according to the hotline survey. This is a global problem that transcends religion, wealth, class, race and culture.
But it is also true that in the West, men still believe that they are superior to women, despite protests to the contrary. They still receive better pay for equal work -- whether in the mailroom or the boardroom -- and women are still treated as sexualized commodities whose power and influence flow directly from their appearance.
And for those who are still trying to claim that Islam oppresses women, recall this 1992 statement from the Rev. Pat Robertson, offering his views on empowered women: Feminism is a "socialist, anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians."
Now you tell me who is civilized and who is not.



__________________

من هناك
01-18-2007, 07:54 PM
Thank you for the article.
Her story is amazing and inspiring.

nawwar
01-27-2007, 04:38 PM
:that's good
nikab= muslimah

من هناك
08-26-2007, 07:07 AM
AN E - INTERVIEW WITH YVONNE RIDLEY


By Ms Samaa Elibyari


Q1. Six years after September 11, 2001 the majority of Muslims living
in the West still dread this date. They feel a mixture of sadness and
frustration. What about you?

It is a terrible day in history and I think it affected everyone and
continues to do so today. But I don't think Muslims should feel -- or
more importantly, be made to feel -- guilty or responsible in anyway,
about what happened that day. It is like demanding every Jewish
person feels guilt for the continuing injustices against
Palestinians, or holding every man to account for every single rape
against a woman.

Q2. After you converted to Islam, the BBC News Online wrote; "it has
been suggested [she] is a victim of Stockholm syndrome, in which
hostages take the side of the hostage-takers." Is this a valid
assessment?

The Stockholm Syndrome thing always makes me laugh. I was the
prisoner from hell. I spat, swore, threw things at my captors and
even went on hunger strike. To suffer from SS you have to bond with
your jailers in the first place. The only people I bonded with, and
still keep in touch with to this day, were the other western
prisoners. The syndrome thing is used by detractors and those who
cannot explain why a professional western woman would embrace Islam.

Q3. Some converts (or reverts) to Islam or other faiths do it
privately, quietly. You chose to be very public; why?

I actually did do it quietly. Check the newspapers around the time of
July 2003 when I converted. This is yet another urban myth.

Q4. You are quoted as saying, "my faith is my nationality and when
you attack it you are being racist." Can you explain further?

What I am saying is nothing different to the views held by committed
Christians and Jews. If you attack a nationality, you are being
racist. You cannot attack someone for being an Indian, or Pakistani,
or Chinese, Jamaican etc.

Q5. At a time when some Muslim women choose not to wear a hijab to
avoid hostility and/or compromise their careers -- an option endorsed
by some Islamic scholars -- you now thoroughly cover your hair with a
very opaque headdress. Why? Is this preferable to wearing a hat, for
example? Do you thrive on the challenge of being visually identified
as a Muslim?

Wearing the hijab is an obligation under Islam. It is a requirement
and is stated quite clearly in references in our Holy Qur'an. This is
something I've looked into exhaustively and spoken at length with
real scholars and sheikhs whose background, lineage and education
cannot be disputed. I did not wear the hijab immediately; it took
some time and I believe every committed Muslimah will get there in
the end. These Islamic scholars you talk about cannot justify the
hijab as an option. There are those who I call "scholars for dollars"
who do push certain government lines. They know who they are and they
know what they are saying is wrong. Having said that, I think a
sister's decision to wear the hijab is personal -- she knows her
responsibilities to God and will personally have to answer for her
actions one day.

Q6. During your campaign as a candidate for the Respect Party, you
presented a six-point plan for your constituency, which included the
advancement of women. What did you intend to do for women?

I just want women, all women regardless of faith, culture or
background, to know their rights and demand them. The only way they
can do this is through education and, as Islam states quite clearly,
education is vitally important. There are even Islamic references
that if you can't get knowledge at home then go out and seek it.

Q7. Did anyone tell you that the issue of women's advancement
conflicted with the perception they have of women in Islam (i.e.
being submissive, etc.)

They only tell me once. I put them right and they don't come back!

Q8. You have been very outspoken about the treatment of Muslims in
Britain. Let's compare notes. What is it that you deplore and
denounce?

There are many characteristics I deplore and it is not just in
Muslims. I deplore cowardice, I deplore men who bully women, I
deplore men who use and abuse women. I deplore those who use and
manipulate their faith. I get outraged at men who tell me I cannot go
and pray in a mosque because it is men-only. And it still kills me
inside when I think of the mosque committee in Blackburn UK, which
forbids Muslim women from praying inside its mosque, yet were
prepared to roll out the red carpet for Condoleezza Rice.

Q9. On June 7, 2006, The Daily Telegraph, reported: "Yvonne Ridley,
the former journalist who was kidnapped by the Taliban, has said that
Muslims in east London should stop co-operating with the police after
last week's terror raid in which a man was shot." Please explain your
position.

Interesting how I was called a "former journalist." It was as though
they were trying to isolate me. What I said was taken out of context.
I knew those two young men who were arrested - one shot - were
totally innocent of any wrongdoing. What I said was that the
community should stop co-operating with the police until they were
released. Interestingly enough, I was vindicated some months ago when
the Metropolitan Police was forced to apologize to the two brothers,
including the one who was shot in his own home by armed anti-terror
officers. I am not an anarchist and the police do have a role to
play, but this does not give them the right to tear into Muslim
communities, tooled up and armed with misinformation. This particular
force is still suffering from institutionalized racism and is deeply
homophobic. Senior officers publicly invited me to contact them
during a Radio 4 broadcast and when I did they failed to return my
calls. It was weasel words for the benefit of spin and public image.

Q10. You said that the UK is the third most-hated country. Your sharp
criticism of your government has lead some to suggest, "If you hate
your country so much, why don't you leave?" How do you respond to
them?

Again this is being taken out of context. But, at the end of the day,
I enjoy free speech in Britain so why shouldn't I say what I want?
Why am I suddenly being denied the right to exercise my right to
freedom of speech? I love my country and I would not get so upset
about its reputation abroad if I didn't.

Q11. Britain's new PM Gordon Brown prepares to depart from Iraq but
to move even more heavily into Afghanistan. Your comments? How are
Islamic organizations in the UK reacting to that announcement?

Gordon Brown is the man who signed the cheques for the war in Iraq --
let's wait and see on that score. On Afghanistan, we need to throw
financial aid and help to the Afghan people, not arm soldiers and
send them in to their deaths, which is what is happening. The British
Army has never yet had a successful campaign in Afghanistan over the
years.